How old is too old to be president?


, ,

Earlier today, I posted on my micro blog about the Democratic party becoming the party of stodgy old people; here I want to expound on that idea.

Let’s start with a list of presidential candidates and their ages:

Democratic: Chafee 62, Clinton 67, O’Malley 52, and Sanders 73.

Republican: Bush 62, Carson 63, Christie 52, Cruz 44, Fiorina 60, Graham 59, Huckabee 59, Jindal 44, Pataki 70, Paul 52, Perry 65, Rubio 44, Santorum 57, and Trump 69.

As an aside, the FAA forces commercial airline pilots into retirement at the age of 60. Actually they can transfer to be a flight engineer or something similar, but they can not pilot a commercial airline. No Exceptions! No physical or mental check up to get a waiver, do not pass go, do not collect $200. Is not the most powerful position on the planed at least as important as a commercial pilot?

Of the 19 people currently running for president, 11 of them would be unfit to fly come inauguration day, January 2017. That is nearly 60% for those too lazy to pull up WolframAlpha. They are not qualified to fly a plane and they certainly have no business having the keys to the nuclear arsenal.

The democratic candidates have an average age of 63.5 and that will increase by a year and a half before they take office.  The republican candidate average age is 53.3. On average the republican candidates are a whopping 10+ years younger than their democratic counterparts. So, once again I inquire, when did the democratic party become the party of stodgy old people?

It took 3 generations to initiate global climate change, move the US from the largest creditor nation to the largest debtor the world has ever known, remove the nutrition from our food, begin the 6th great extinction, turn our planet into a giant waste dump,  virtually pave the entire planet and pollute our land, seas, and air. In the US we call those 3 generations the greatest generation, the silent generation, and the baby boomers. These people have had their chance to wield power and have proven themselves inadequate to the task, it is well past time to send them off to retirement. If we survive, it will take 100 generations to undo the damage they have done. None of them deserve to be president, the planet and her inhabitants can not bear it.

Edit: Jim Web just announced he is throwing his hat into the ring, at 69 he further raises the average democratic age.

30 Years Ago Today


, ,

New Coke was introduced. There was an uproar, careers were ruined, the product was rolled back, and balance was restored to the universe. But that isn’t what I want to write about.
30 years ago today the Philadelphia PD with help from the FBI bombed the home of radical group MOVE. 60 houses were burned down, children were shot as they tried to escape the flames, Mayor Goode took full responsibility. There was no uproar, no careers were ruined, nobody was charged (let alone convicted), Goode was re-elected and balance has yet to be restored.
This same mentality latter led to the siege at Ruby Ridge and the massacre at Waco, among others. Murder under the color of authority leaves less of an impression than changing the formula of a soft drink. WTF? And I am supposed to be proud of my country? Yeah, I’ll get right on that.

–Posted from my mobile device

The Vaccination Hysteria


, ,

After watching from the sidelines as the recent measles outbreak brought about the gnashing of teeth and the pulling of hair from what are otherwise mostly sane folks, I thought I might take a stab at adding another line of argument to the debate.

Before I get too far into the subject, let me state that I believe that the autism connection with vaccines has been pretty well discredited. Were I to have children I would probably get them vaccinated, and were I to choose not to, I would not move to Marin county.

Vaccines are a medical procedure, as such, folks have a right to know the dangers and a right to refuse the procedure. These are basic rights and are a standard part of medical ethics. Each vaccine comes with a Vaccine Information Statement. This statement lists what disease is being vaccinated against, the dangers of the disease, and the risks of the vaccination. No vaccine is without some risk, as a parent it is your right and responsibility to weigh the risks and benefits to determine the proper course for your child.

Since measles are in the news, lets take a moment to look at the risks associated with the MMR vaccine. Some are quite mild but pervasive; fever (1 in 6), rash (1 in 20), swelling of glands (1 in 75). Other reactions are quite serious, if less common; seizures (1 in 3000), low platelet count leading to bleeding disorder (1 in 30000). Severe problems are rare (1 in 1000000), but include deafness, long term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, and permanent brain damage. Now multiply this danger, from one common vaccination, by the 20+ vaccines and boosters that are recommended in the first 2 years and add the vaccines that pregnant women are recommended and it becomes understandable why some might choose not to vaccinate.

While mercury has been removed from childhood vaccines (it is still in flu shots and other adult vaccines), they still contain aluminum and formaldehyde. Can anyone actually state that it is a good idea to inject babies with formaldehyde?

Want to make me change my views on this? Simply repeal the congress granted immunity that the vaccine manufacturers have. If the manufacturers themselves lobbied congress for immunity from liability, then even they question the safety of their own product. And the fact that congress acted on it, shows that they too question the safety. If the vaccines are so safe, why did congress step in to “immunize” these corporations from liability?

My final argument supporting vaccination choice, is just that…choice. Were we to force vaccinations as some societal good, then why not force abortions on women who might not have the resources to properly raise a child? Certainly, society has an interest? (For the record, I would oppose that also.) While some may argue that this is a slippery slope argument, it can certainly also be argued that this is simply carrying the idea to its logical conclusion. If a woman’s right to her own body is so sacrosanct that she can choose to kill her unborn child, than certainly one’s right to their own body and its functions must include the right to reject a medical procedure that you find unsavory, FOR WHATEVER REASON.

For these reasons, I unequivocally support a parent’s inherent right to reject vaccinations for their children.

Related links:
Vaccine Information Statements at CDC
Recommended vaccination chart (pdf file)

Edit: Interesting fact; since 2005 there have been zero deaths from measles and 86 deaths from the MMR vaccine.

30 Day Book Challenge: Day 29


A book everyone hated but you liked?

I stalled on this question for a couple of days, and I’m still not happy with the answer that I came up with, but I am going to go with the Te of Piglet by Benjamin Hoff. It wasn’t as approachable as his previous book, The Tao of Pooh, so most of my then friends didn’t care for it.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 183 other followers